Posts: 62
	Threads: 17
	Joined: Nov 2007
	
	
 
	
	
		Just after pasting mot thank to nick t .At the week end past he made my car half a ton lighter Know the co is .80 and HC 100 before 2 and HC 2400 slight change and goes like a shoaled cat . How i can put my new number on .
	 
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 517
	Threads: 29
	Joined: Jul 2006
	
	
 
	
	
		nice one 
	 
	
	
DOC 527
Vin #10264
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,560
	Threads: 36
	Joined: Jul 2006
	
	
 
	
	
		Very nice reg number, congrats on the MOT ...Just off on Hols for 2 weeks.
	
	
	
Chris Parnham
Ex RHD Auto's etc.etc
Main Car.. Kia E Niro 4+
Skoda Yetil 4X4.
1970 Jago Jeep.
DOC Club Historian 
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,272
	Threads: 79
	Joined: Sep 2007
	
	
 
	
	
		zippy Wrote:the co is .80
I thought the CO was meant to be about 2.0% ?
	
 
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
		1.5 to 2.5 % on the volvo engine (with volvo gear)
0.5 to 1.5 % on the stock engine.
NickT
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,272
	Threads: 79
	Joined: Sep 2007
	
	
 
	
	
		Thanks for clearing that up Nick. Out of interest why is it so different between engines?
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
		Stock engine uses KE-Jetronic
Your version uses K-Jetronic
The 'E' being "Elektronic" (German). This is sort of an add on the K-Jetronic to be able to control the fuelling for catalytic converter equipped cars. The fuelling is overall leaner than just K-Jetronic and the lambda system will fine tune the air/fuel ratio to "stoichiometric" ie perfect air to fuel ratio of 14.7 to 1. This is known as Lambda value 1 on the current MOT emissions. The fuel computer basically bleeds off fuel from the fuel distributor to alter the pressure at the injectors to control the amount of fuel going in.
The bleed valve is the "frequency" valve and is just a LH-Jetronic injector who's on to off ratio is altered accordingly by the fuel computer.
If this does not bleed the fuel then the usual result would be overfuelling of the engine and high CO and/ or high HC (unburnt fuel).
NickT
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,272
	Threads: 79
	Joined: Sep 2007
	
	
 
	
	
		Thats interesting. Surely the KE-Jetronic system should be more ecconomical than the K-Jetronic if its using slightly less fuel?
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 62
	Threads: 17
	Joined: Nov 2007
	
	
 
	
	
		I my self think it is to low will put it up now it has past more power .